BLOGGER TEMPLATES AND TWITTER BACKGROUNDS �

Monday, April 11, 2011

indian missile dhanush tested successfully


India successfully test-fired Prithvi II, Dhanush
Indigenously developed, nuclear-capable ballistic missile Prithvi-II was today test- fired from the Integrated Test Range (ITR) at Chandipur, about 15 km from here off Orissa coast, in less than an hour of flight testing of "Dhanush" from a naval ship.
"Prithvi-II missile, which has a maximum range of 350 kms, was test fired from a mobile launcher at the launch complex-3 in the ITR" at around 1100 hours, defence sources said.
Official sources said trials of both "Dhanush", test-fired from a warship at a spot between Paradip and Puri, and Prithvi-II missiles were successful.
"Prithvi-II missile has proved its robustness and accuracy repeatedly during many trials earlier," a Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) official said.

Sunday, April 10, 2011

ISI OF PAKISTAN IS 100% INVOLVED IN HELPING TALIBAN IN AFGHANISTAN






Syed Jamaluddin has been constantly saying since 2001 that Pakistan´s secret agency called INTER-SERVICES INTELLIGENCE (ISI) is 100% involved in providing all types of support to Taliban in Afghanistan. In his book titled "DIVIDE PAKISTAN TO ELIMINATE TERRORISM", Syed Jamaluddin has categorically mentioned that ISI has been assisting TALIBAN in many ways. Taliban camps based in Afghanistan as well as bordering region along side Pakistan get consistent financial, logistical and military assistance from ISI and Pakistan Army. Time has come for the international community to realize this fact now before its too late. The international community should immediately disintegrate Pakistan in order to dismantle the terrorist network operating in Afghanistan with the assistance of Pakistan Army and ISI. Pakistan´s disintegration will crush the power of terrorists because formation of independent countries like BALOCHISTAN and PAKHTOONISTAN will become a great hurdle in the way of ISI to continue its support for the Taliban.

Saturday, April 9, 2011

PAKISTAN'S INTELLIGENCE AGENCY IS THE DIRTIEST IN THE WHOLE WORLD

 The British government has said there is a "clear link" between Pakistan's intelligence agency, ISI and three major militant outfits Lashkar-e-Toiba, Jaish-e-Mohammed and Harakat Mujahideen operating in Jammu and Kashmir, and proscribed by Britain.

"Terrorism (from across the border) has had the covert support of the Inter Services Intelligence (ISI)," the main intelligence agency in Pakistan, British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw, who recently visited India and Pakistan to defuse their tension, told the House of Commons.

 "Her majesty's government accepts that there is a clear link between ISI and these groups—Lashkar-e-Toiba, Jaish-e-Mohammed and Harakat Mujahideen—which have been proscribed in Britain", he said.

After the government had made a similar statement in the House of Lords, one member said Britain should impress upon India that it should implement the UN resolutions on Kashmir.




India born lord Swraj Paul intervened to say that the best course was to take a realistic view of the situation now. Both India and Pakistan should be persuaded that the war was not an answer to their problems and that they should sit together and find a solution through dialogue.

Lord Paul praised the hard work and the efforts of Straw and the British High Commissioner in New Delhi Sir Rob Young to defuse the Indo-Pak situation.

PAKISTAN PROMOTING TERRORISM IN INDIA WITH ISI


On the other hand, even if the US does not accede to its extreme demands like taking an indulgent view of its cross-border terrorism against India, supporting Washington DC will help to protect, if not further, what Pakistan perceives to be its two principal national goals. The first relates to keeping alive the Taliban, which it had founded with the help of the United States' Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in May, 1994. The second relates to ensuring the survival of fundamentalist terrorist outfits like the Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT), Harkat-ul Mujaheedin (HuM), Hizb-ul Mujaheedin (HM), Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM) and the Al-Badr Mujaheedin (AM), it has established, financed, provided and armed to conduct cross-border terrorism against India.



Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) established the Taliban with the help of the CIA to gain control over Afghanistan. One of its principal aims in this, as well as its earlier participation in the war in Afghanistan against Soviet occupation, was to gain strategic depth vis-a-vis India by having a client regime in Kabul and, subsequently, further its expansionist designs in Central Asia. The US also wanted a regime in Afghanistan which would ensure undisturbed flow of crude oil from Central Asia to Pakistani ports like Karachi and eventually, to refineries of its oil giants.



Pakistan needs to keep the Taliban alive to retain the control it has established over almost the whole of Afghanistan through it. It also needs to keep alive the terrorist militias for conducting its proxy war against India through cross-border terrorism, and for fomenting secessionist movements in different parts of this country. Its lending of full support to the US in any attack on Afghanistan will not in conflict with the twin objectives. It is not difficult to understand why. Very few men of Osama bin Laden's terrorist outfit, Al Qaida would be in Afghanistan by the time the US military attack begins. Given the experience of US air strikes against them in August, 1998, following their bomb attacks on US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania earlier that month, the bulk of them must have started moving out of their camps and bases even before the terrorist strikes on September 11.

While some of them perhaps remain in Afghanistan to fight US troops if they move in, the natural destination for others is Pakistan where they can lie low until the storm passes. The ISI has been working in close cooperation with bin Laden. Besides, organisations like the LeT, HuM, HM, JeM, AM and so on, have themselves established contacts with both the Taliban and Al-Qaida. Significantly, Pakistan kept its border with Afghanistan open though the US requested Islamabad to close it in the immediate aftermath of last Tuesday's terrorist outrages.

By cooperating with the US, Pakistan would not, therefore, be helping to liquidate bin Laden and his men. Rather, it seems to hope that such cooperation would spare its own terrorist training and staging camps from American retribution. If that happens, it will emerge from the conflict, that appears to be round the corner, with at least a section of the Taliban and its own terrorist training and staging camps and their inmates safe and ready for further action. It is, however, not taking chances. Camps run in Pakistan Occupied Kashmir (PoK) and Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) bordering Afghanistan, by organisations like the HuM, HM, JeM, Harkat-ul Jihadi Islami, Tehreek-e-Jihadi Islami and the Muslim Mujaheedin, for training terrorists for infiltrating into India and committing terrorist acts, are being closed down. The trainee terrorists are reportedly moving into safer areas. Thus even if these are bombed, the trainees would live to fight another day; the same applies to people who are with the Taliban and Al Qaida.






If the US seriously wants to squelch terrorism, it should ask Islamabad to not only hand over personnel of the Taliban and Al Qaida who have moved into Pakistan but act firmly against those of the LeT, HuM, HM, JeM, AM and so on. Failure to do so will not only be inconsistent with its resolve to wipe out terrorism in all its forms and manifestations, but invite trouble for itself in the future. Pakistan's fundamentalist terrorist outfits, causing death and destruction in India, also hate the US, which they regard as the principal supporter of Zionism and the source of all moral pollution in the world. Yossef Bodansky, Director, US Congressional Task Force on Terrorism and Unconventional Warfare, quotes, in his highly informative book, Bin Laden: The Man Who Declared War on America, Prof Hafeez Mohammad Saeed, leader of the Markaz-al-Dawa al-Irshad (whose striking arm is the LeT) as saying that the White House was "the source of all mischief in the world" and the day "was not far off when the mujaheedin will blow it up through their jihad".

The Pakistani Army will revive the fundamentalist Islamic terrorist organisations in future if they now escape by and large untouched. It has been thoroughly infiltrated by hard-line Islamic fundamentalists who are also bitterly anti-American. In 1990, its chief, General Aslam Beg was ousted when he was about to stage a coup "in defiance of American hegemony". Khaled Ahmed, who writes this in his chapter 'Fundamental Flaws' in On the Abyss: Pakistan after the Coup (HarperCollins publishers India), says that his successor, Gen Asif Nawaz, a secular person and a professional soldier, began taking action against fundamentalist Islamist elements in the Pakistani Army. He removed not only Lt-Gen Hamid Gul as head of the ISI but also Maj-Gen Zaheerul Islam Abbasi, who retaliated by trying to stage a 'revolution' in the Pakistani Army's headquarters "because he was made to salute American officers" while on duty in Gilgit. In December 1996, Gen Nawaz, who was under tremendous pressure from fundamentalist Islamic officers appointed to the Intelligence Bureau by Mr Nawaz Sharif, then Prime Minister, died following a heart attack. He was widely suspected to have been murdered.

Gen Jehangir Keramat, another professional and secular soldier succeeded him. Fundamentalist elements, however, continued to be a formidable presence in the Pakistan Army. According to Khaled Ahmed, Gen Keramat's weakness became clear when the Army's journal, Hilal, published an editorial against him for "secularising the Army", and he was unable to dismiss or sideline the senior officer who had it written.

The ISI too is intensely anti-US. It made sure that the fight against Soviet occupation of Afghanistan was dominated by fundamentalist Muslims. Bodansky writes, "The ISI adamantly opposed supporting Afghan resistance organisations associated with the pre-dominantly tribal traditional Pushtun population, who are essentially pro-Western. Instead, the ISI insisted on diverting more than 70 per cent of the foreign aid to the Islamic parties-particularly Hizb-i-Islami-who were inherently and virulently anti-American.

Friday, April 8, 2011

INDIAN COUTER TERROROSM OPERATIONS AGAINST ISI AND LASHKAR E TOIBA-JAISHE MOHAMMAD THREAT


India's external counter-terrorism policies
India has been the victim of Pakistan-sponsored terrorism since the 1950s. In those years, Pakistan's ISI had supported the insurgent/terrorist groups in India's northeast region and provided them sanctuaries, training, arms and ammunition in the Chittagong Hill Tracts of the then East Pakistan. India's anxiety to stop this played an important role in its assistance to the people of East Pakistan to liberate themselves.

Since 1980, the ISI has been providing sanctuaries, training, arms and ammunition in Pakistan to religious terrorist groups operating in Punjab, J&K and other parts of India. It is also infiltrating the mercenaries of the Pakistani pan-Islamic jihadi organisations into India to promote cross-border terrorism.


India has taken up this issue with the US since 1992 and wants Pakistan declared a State sponsor of international terrorism under US laws and have punitive action taken against it. In 1993, the Clinton administration placed Pakistan on a watch list of suspected State sponsors of international terrorism for six months and forced Nawaz Sharif , who was then in power, to sack Lieutenant General Javed Nasir, then ISI's director-general, and other senior officers. This did not have any effect on the use of terrorism by the ISI.

Since 9/11, Pakistan's military-intelligence establishment has been collaborating with the US in taking action against Al Qaeda elements posing a threat to US nationals and interests. But it has not taken any action against cross-border terrorism directed against India and to destroy terrorist infrastructure in PoK and the Northern Areas.



After the attack by terrorists belonging to LET and JEM on the Indian Parliament in December 2001, India mobilised and deployed its Army on the border in response to public pressure for action against the terrorist infrastructure in Pakistani territory. In response to appeals from the US, UK and other friendly governments, India refrained from action against Pakistan. Under US pressure, Pakistan banned LET and JEM, but not HUJI and HUM, and arrested some of their leaders and cadres. They have since been released.

US officials themselves admit Pakistan has not implemented its assurances to the US that it would put a stop to cross-border terrorism in J&K. Despite this, the US is reluctant to act against Pakistan because of its cooperation in assisting the US in neutralising Al Qaeda elements who have taken shelter in Pakistan.



India has made it clear that there will be no question of any talks with Pakistan on the normalisation of bilateral relations till it stops cross-border terrorism, winds up the terrorist infrastructure in its territory and gives up the use of terrorism as a weapon against India.





India has also been greatly concerned over the use of Bangladesh territory by religious and non-religious terrorists operating against India. The non-religious terrorist groups continue to enjoy sanctuaries in the CHT. Of the religious terrorist organisations, HUJI has an active branch in Bangladesh. Some Al Qaeda elements, who escaped into Pakistan from Afghanistan, have found their way into Bangladesh, where they have been given shelter by HUJI.





There is active complicity between the ISI and its counterpart in Dhaka in this matter. The Bangladesh authorities have not been co-operating with India in taking effective action against the large-scale illegal immigration into India. However, keeping in view the otherwise good relations with Bangladesh, India has been trying to have these problems sorted out bilaterally at the political and diplomatic levels. But the progress so far has been disappointing.

Wednesday, April 6, 2011

INDIAN SAGARIKA MISSILE TESTD SUCCESSFULY

 DRDO may also be developing a 300-km submarine-launched ballistic missile, Sagarika, based on the Prithvi. The program is reported to have started in 1992 and was originally reported to involve adapting a ramjet engine to the missile to reduce the need for heavy oxidizers. India does not have a submarine configured for launching ballistic missiles. (1)

According to other reports, India is developing the Dhanush (Bow, as in "bow and arrow" not the bow of the ship) submarine launched ballistic missile. With a range variously estimated at between 300 km and 350 km, this missile which would be later deployed on surface warships. It is unclear whether this missile would be deployed on India's new nuclear missile submarine.



Danush is a medium range indigenously developed ship-launched missile exclusively developed for the Navy. The Dhanush project is sometimes considered the Naval version of the Prithvi, though this may represent a program analog rather than any technological relationship.




There are two versions of the 8.56 meter long Dhanush missile under development. One such version, having a range of 250 km. This short-range missile will be used as an anti-ship weapon. The Indian Navy is apparently seeking another variant of the Dhanush surface-to-surface ballistic missile that is capable of striking land targets within a range of 500 km. The longer-range missile will have propulsion fuel similar to its short-range version.



Testing of this missile was originally planned to begin in December 1998. The first flight test of the Dhanush was conducted on 11 April 2000 from INS Subhadra, close to the Orissa coast in the Bay of Bengal. The missile flew for only four seconds and broke into two pieces, barely managing to clear the ship. The launch was dubbed a "technology demonstrator" and several more missile tests may be required to make this weapon battle-worthy.

With the development of Dhanush still at an early stage, the debate on cruise versus ballistic missiles has revived within the Navy.

The precise relationship between the Dhanush and the Sagarika programs remains obscure. Given the evident similarities in their overall characteristics, Dhanush may simply be the new name for the original Sagarika system. However, since the Dhanush is reported by some sources to have a 350 km range, compared to the 250-300 km range of the Sagarika, the change in designation may reflect a design change.


Tuesday, April 5, 2011

INDIAN SUPERSONIC MISSIE BRAHMOS'S ADVANTAGES

 China and Pakistan should pay attention to India’s newest anti-ship missile, the BrahMos. It is an anti-ship missile with a 660-pound warhead. It has a highly sophisticated ramjet engine, which speeds a three-ton missile to its target at Mach-3 speed.

In its initial flight trajectory it hugs the sea, making it impossible for jet fighters, anti-missile systems and rapid firing guns to stop it. In its terminal phase, it rises up to the sky and then drops on its prey like a giant harpoon. The missile’s high speed causes extensive damage to a ship on impact and the 660 pounds of explosives it carries cause the rest of the damage.

It can also be described as a sea-denial missile – denying an enemy access to the sea it defends.

The missile, originally called the Yakhont, was designed by the Soviets to kill U.S. aircraft carriers 200 miles away. In 1991 the United States expressed concern about its development and Russian President Boris Yeltsin, a U.S. friend at the time, shelved the project. This turned out to be India’s gain.

India took over the development work in 1998, agreeing to spend over US$250 million on the project. The Russian missile engine was married to an Indian guidance system in a 50:50 partnership, thus giving it the unique name of BrahMos, after India’s Brahmaputra River and Russia’s Moskva River.




The Chinese asked the Russians for similar collaboration on a similar missile system, but were flatly turned down. Instead the Russians equipped Chinese destroyers with Moskit class sea-skimming ramjet missiles. These are very capable missiles with a range of 90 to 150 kilometers. But these could neither be launched from aircraft nor have land-to-land use.

India expects about US$10 billion in orders for these missiles. The production line is gearing up to make 1,000 of these in various versions over the next ten years. If an additional export order for 1,000 more missiles is obtained the production line will have to be significantly expanded. Right now there no export orders – that will limit production to about 50-100 missiles a year.

A comparable missile in the U.S. inventory is the Tomahawk cruise missile, which has an extended range and larger explosive payload than others. But it is a subsonic missile, and thus can fall prey to fighter jets or anti-air or anti-missile system.

Collaboration between the Russians and Indians has produced a marvelous weapon. Future collaboration between the two nations is in the cards, in developing a fifth-generation fighter jet, a new tank design, etc. This is helpful to both countries. The Russians can defray the development costs and India gets a sophisticated weapon. Barring a few hiccups this collaboration will continue.


India has no intention of killing U.S. aircraft carriers, hence its development and operation were not questioned by the United States. On the other hand, a Chinese naval flotilla approaching the Indian Ocean on an aggressive mission would be fair game for this missile.

The same is true of any aggressive moves by the Pakistani Navy. The latter has always envisioned attacking India’s offshore oil and gas fields close to Mumbai, and repeating the Muslim destruction of India’s Somnath Temple on the Gujarat coast, 900 years back.

The version of the BrahMos that went into operation in 2005 is the naval version only. Another version, which can be carried by an aircraft or used in land-to-land combat, is still under development and should be operational in about three years.

Collaboration on the missile’s development was not easy. In 1998 the Russians were strictly following the guidelines of the Missile Technology Control Regime and would not export any missile technology beyond the 300-kilometer (186-mile) range. It also would not give India any help in building a sophisticated guidance system.



Hence this missile has a limited range of 290 kilometers (180 miles) and has an Indian guidance system. All testing and development since 1998 have been carried out in India, with the Russians as a 50-percent partner.

Beginning in 2002 when the missile first flew, it surprised most observers. Few thought that Russian-Indian collaboration could be successful and produce a weapon of that sophistication. Now it is a reality. Some Indian Navy ships are already equipped with it. Soon the air and land version will join the Indian forces, making them highly potent.

This technology acquisition and development was so important for India that the military went out of its way not to draw international attention. Technology transfer arrangements were such that no MTCR guidelines were broken.

Also in India’s neighborhood, Pakistan has acquired U.S. Harpoon and French Exocet missiles, and China has been buying Russian Sovremenny-class destroyers – hence India had to do something unique to put both China and Pakistan on the defensive. It appears that India has now achieved that task.

Although the missile is so successful, India was expecting other nations to order it. But no export orders have been received so far, despite an intense sales pitch over the last three years. None of the potential customers wishes to kill U.S. or other nations’ aircraft carriers; hence they do not need such a powerful weapon. Also, at US$2.5 million apiece the price is a bit steep. The original requirement of 1,000 missiles for the Indian and Russian navies still stands.



The future of this missile in Indian hands is very bright. It will permanently keep the Chinese navy out of the Indian Ocean. Closer to home, the belligerent Pakistan is unmindful of these developments. Their Harpoon missile inventory is very capable, but is subsonic and has a very limited range. The BrahMos, carried on ships and planes, can be fired from 200 miles away and hit its target with pinpoint accuracy.

The scramjet-powered BrahMos-2 will again be developed with Russian collaboration. That is the only way India will lay its hands on scramjet technology. The irony is that the MTCR will prevent its range from exceeding 300 kilometers.

This development work will take three years and will involve 20 Russian and Indian institutes and industrial units to finish the job. The only thing known about this newer missile, the BrahMos-2, is that it will fly at about Mach-5 to Mach-7 speed and will beat any known anti aircraft or anti-missile defense system.



It's a new cruise missile called the Brahmos. And it's what reportedly has Pakistan's defence planners scurrying to develop a land attack cruise missile, possibly a modified Harpoon missile acquired from the US in the 80s and 90s.

Brahmos combines the names of two rivers: the Brahmaputra and the Mosocow. It symbolises the close partnership that exists between India and Russia.

Here's why the Brahmos is considered the world's finest. It can fly at speeds of up to Mach 3, three times the speed of sound. It can destroy ships and targets on land. It can be launched from the air, submarines and onboard ships.

The Brahmos will be deployed on the Sukhoi 30 MKI, the mainstay of the Indian Air Force. The Sukhoi's ability to fly thousands of kilometres after being re-fuelled in-air means that the Brahmos can be used to strike targets across large parts of South Asia.

"It is the fastest and most precise cruise-missile in the world," affirms Pravin Pathak, Additional GM BrahMos Aerospace.

Today, with Russian assistance, and missiles like the Brahmos, the Indian Navy's frontline ships are fitted with the fastest and possibly most lethal anti-ship weapons ever developed